July 15, 2015 by Amine Berrada
Poor Camera
This camera is great for still photography such as architecture, portraits, buildings etc However it does a horrible job with motion or action photography. The camera produces a lot of noise also when doing landscape photography during harsh daylight. This camera is perfect though for architecture and urban landscape and produces sharp images.
June 28, 2015 by Rich
LOVE THIS CAMERA
I've been an Olympus camera user since the early 70s starting with the OMD-1 and OMD-4. My first digital was the Olympus E510, but bought the OMD-EM5 about a year after it was introduced. I wanted to go back to the smaller footprint body. The camera is everything thing I expected. I just recently purchased the Mark II and find it a step up in features and performance from the OMD-EM5. The 5-axis image stabilization is incredible for handheld stills. I don't typically shoot movies, but I will with this feature and this camera will replace my compact digital video cam. The silent shutter mode is wonderful which I used recently photographing hummingbirds. Once they get accustomed to the the camera setup, I use the silent mode and high frame rate and it doesn't bother the birds. There are more features to explore over the next several months. If you already own and like your OMD-EM5 you'll want to upgrade to the Mark II
Read More
June 27, 2015 by Alan
Terrific Camera and System
I waited about 2 months to write this review to give me real experience with the Oly EM-5 MK II. I have been a die hard Canon person. Last summer at 62 I hiked all over Glacier Intern'l Park with a 70D, 100-400L, 10=22 EFS, & 18-200 EFS. I did have the good sense to leave the 70-200 f2.8L home, but the weight of what I did bring was a killer. So before my 2 weeks in England and France this month, I decided to go Olympus "light". One of the reasons I had not done so before was that as a macro and video fan, I really valued the fully articulating LCD and no mirrorless except Samsung had this, until the EM5 – so I took the leap. A month before I left for London, Monet's Garden, and a 6 garden tour of southern England, I purchased the camera, 14-150mm ED, 12-40 ED 2.8 pro, 40-150 2.8 ED pro, the 1.4 teleconverter, and the 60mm ED 2.8 Macro. The 40-150 heaviest of the lenses, but is 1/3 the weight of either the 70-200 or 100-400 Canon. I'm convinced the optics of the pro-line of lenses is as good as Canon. The 14-150mm is slower and not quite as good – but man-o-man, a great walk around lens with great results. All this stuff plus the little flash fits nicely into a daypack no problem and without strain (smallish Lowepro CompuDay pack). Having read on line that the menu system is complex, I read the entire manual prior to opening the box and then spent a month messing and testing. Note that IMHO the menu system is NOT complicated, it's just that there are so many options and features that it takes a while to understand and use what is available. I've not used all the modes, filters, etc. Much to learn. But getting the most useful settings and using the Myset features is not hard. After a bit of messing around you'll easily get the logic of the menu system and become very facile at making changes in the field and on the fly. Tip: have the manual in pdf format in a reader on your smartphone for reference till you're comfy with it). Image quality is excellent – comparable to my Canon 70D. There may be a noise price that you pay starting at about ISO >1600 compared with full frame systems, but my impression is that it's not much more than with my 70D. However, at Trooping the Colours in London, it was gray skies and using ISO 1000+ and the f4-5.6 14-150 (not the pro) and I got great shots of the Royal family even with pretty extreme crops and a bit of LR adjustments my shots of the Royal Family are winners. I am thoroughly happy with my selection of this camera and don't anticipating much use of my Canon system (tho I can't quite bring myself to sell it, yet). Some "minor" issues and findings: trying to hit the OK button by touch often resulted in hitting the 4-way arrow pad which changes the focus center – finally getting the hang of that. In general, it takes time to get used to hitting the right buttons by feel without looking. Also, the default set up has the exposure bias adjusted with the front wheel. I found that it got turned sometimes when putting the camera in the bag and such and then the exposure bias was set inadvertently. You can change that set up, but I found that I like it the way it is and I just learned to check that routinely - if bias is set, it's displayed clearly in the viewfinder and LCD. Battery life, as noted in other reviews, isn't great. I have 4 batteries and if shooting all day long, will use 2, occasionally a 3rd if a particularly intense day of shooting. I have the battery grip which I'm not 100% sold on. I like the small form factor and weight of the camera without the grip (I have fairly large hands but still love the size and ergonomics of the camera without the grip - but the grip is growing on me), and the grip does give you all day battery life AND I really like the 2 extra customizable function buttons which is perhaps the best feature (for me) of the grip. Finally, one word about the pro line of lenses: Besides great optics, they give you an additional function button AND a focus ring that has 2 slide positions – slide it back for manual focus regardless of what the camera is set to. In using the lenses for the first time, I inadvertently slid the ring back and not knowing about this feature thought the lens was defective – none of the autofocus modes could be used. I actually got an RMA from the retailer to return it, but then contacted Olympus and they responded promptly letting me know about the feature. Felt pretty stupid, and I cancelled the RMA and It has become my favorite feature of the these lenses. By the way, the only lens I wasn't thrilled with was the 9-18 f4-5.6 zoom. Didn’t think it was as sharp as it should be. I returned it and will wait for the "pro" wide zoom to be available. I did consider the Sony Full Frame mirrorless system when deciding on this purchase. In short the reasons for going with the EM-5 II was, form function and weight, OLY 5-axis stabilization (which works great –including video) – the newer Sony's have this, but many of the better lenses have OSS adding weight and cost. As for the the lenses. check out the equivalent lenses in the Sony line up. Either you won't find them or they'll be quite a bit heavier, larger, and slower – they have no zooms currently at f2.8. Finally, at the time of my purchase, the Sony's did not have the fully articulating LCD - which if you do macro and video work is a must in my mind. But, if you need the reduced noise at very high iso that the full frame sensor might give you, take a good look at the Sony line up. I highly recommend this system for enthusiasts who want to lighten the load and are willing to put up with a bit more noise at high ISOs. It's an incredible camera with a huge scope of special functions I haven't gotten to yet.
Read More
June 20, 2015 by Arnie
Fantastic Camera
This is a terrific camera. For me, the two major selling points (compared to the M1), the full articulating screen and the improvements made to focus peaking (more colors and intensity). I didn't realize how much I missed the articulating screen until I was out in the field with the camera and was able to put the camera into some low angle shots that I couldn't do as easily with the M1. The improvements made to the focus peaking system is a blessing. The M1 is OK at best, the Mark 2 is great! The degree of customization is staggering. The manual does a decent job at explaining the options. But, it's still a camera manual and is lacking in clarity. I don't think there is too much that can't be found with a Google search if you need more information. One minor disappointment is the buffer speed. Maybe I'm being a little nit picky on this but I would like to have seen a bigger internal buffer to speed up processing. Another minor gripe, I do wish Olympus would get away from the proprietary USB connector on the camera body. I bought the camera without the extended grip. The grip design on the Mark 2 is excellent and I have large hands. Ergonomics and button layout is terrific. Image quality will blow you away with the higher end lenses. With the lower end lenses, it's still great. The 75mm lens is ridiculous, I love it. I bought the camera with the 12-40 Pro lens and that lens is absolutely terrific and doesn't leave the camera body. The autofocus capability of the camera is really great. I haven't tried it yet on moving subjects (sports), so I won't comment either way. I didn't think there were too many things that were negative about the M1, I adore that camera. The Mark 2 takes everything to a new level. At this point I haven't tried any of the "Live" mode features so I can't comment on that technology. I would say that's another minor gripe for the manual - more detailed explanations on the "Live" modes. All in all, the E-M5 Mark II is an amazing camera, well done Olympus. The camera really does open up some new avenues for Photography.
Read More
June 16, 2015 by West Coast
Welcome improvements
I've been a happy owner of original E-M5. Now I'm happier with my Mark II. Many improvements to name. Wi-fi remote control was the most important for me. Now you can compose your interesting angle shots without crawling on dirt etc. Your smart phone is both your remote monitor and remote shutter. Completely silent electronic shutter is a wonder for street / event photography. Unlike original E-M5; now the bundled mini-flash acts as commander for FP (HSS) shots. So I can use my existing FP flash as a wireless remote unit. My wish list for Mark III : an improved sensor for higher ISO (just like sister Sony sensors) and hopefully a first wireless radio flash?
Read More
View Page:
  1. 1
  2. ...
  3. 25
  4. 26
  5. 27
  6. ...
  7. 30